Mail Index

• Thread Index

• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• No Subject
  • From:
• Re: Responsible Network Management Guidelines
  • From: Philip Macdonald <macdonal@fas.harvard.edu>
• Re: *scream* Cannot contact AT&T WorldNet NOC
  • From: Geoff Lisk <geoff.lisk@amd.com>
• Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: Mark Goodge <mark.goodge@uk.psi.com>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris@nap.net>
• RE: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: "George J. Broadfoot III" <george@laserlink.net>
• Re: IE4 goes live; Imminent Death of the Net predicted
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Responsible Network Management Guidelines
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: Steve Mansfield <steve@nwnet.net>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: "Jesse M. Caulfield" <jesse@netthink.com>
• Re: *scream* Cannot contact AT&T WorldNet NOC
  • From: Eric Wieling <eric@ccti.net>
• Netcom Contact ?
  • From: Jim Browne <jbrowne@jbrowne.com>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: "Kent W. England" <kwe@geo.net>
• Re: Netcom Contact ?
  • From: Kit Knox <kit@connectnet.com>
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: Joel Sadler - Indentured Servant <null@alaska.net>
• Re: Netcom Contact ?
  • From: nc0168@noc.netcom.net (Mike)
• Re: Worldcomm/UUNet makes a bid for MCI and BROOKS Fiber
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• Re: Netcom Contact ?
  • From: Raymond Wong <negativl@netcom.com>
• AGIS/Cyberpromo Article
  • From: Mark E Larson <markl@rust.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Aaron <aaron@ten.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "Kent W. England" <kwe@geo.net>
• Results of North American NOC contact information verification
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Steve Miller <smiller@corp.webtv.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Scott Portmaster List <scottport@mail.rpa.net>
• [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Jamie Rishaw <jamie@arpa.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Barry Caplin <bc@mtiweb.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Robert Perfetti <perfetti@bbnplanet.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Doug McClure <dmcclure@infi.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: "Selina F. Priestley" <selina@ans.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Tim Salo <salo@networkcs.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
• Re: [techteam] Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Rostand Reymund Lim Abear <rabear@philonline.com.ph>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Debra Kelly <dkelly@counsel.com>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC.. (fwd)
  • From: "Matthew R. Meyer" <mrm@ans.net>
• The Cidr Report
  • From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
• Re: The Cidr Report
  • From: "Philip J. Nesser II" <pjnesser@martigny.ai.mit.edu>
• 971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan
  • From: Chris Layne <nc1206@noc.netcom.net>
• Re: Results of North American NOC contact information verification
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• The List
  • From: "CobraNet's Head Administrator" <nitehawk@cobra.net>
• INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: "Michael Gibson" <magibson@netcom.ca>
• Re: INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: The List
  • From: "Susan R. Harris" <srh@merit.edu>
• Re: INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: John Curran <jcurran@bbnplanet.com>
• Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• Re: 971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Re: INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Joe Kawa <jkawa@critical.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Steve Mansfield <steve@nwnet.net>
• Re: The Cidr Report
  • From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
• [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Joe Kawa <jkawa@critical.net>
• Re: INTERNIC charging for address space?
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• NANOG MEETING SCOTSDALE, AZ 0CT 27 & 28
  • From: Pam Ciesla <pam@merit.edu>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: dougd@airmail.net (Doug Davis)
• QoS/CoS interest (again)
  • From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
• Re: 971003:1520: Fiber-cut in Michigan
  • From: Eric Germann <ekgermann@cctec.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Dan Foster <dsf@frontiernet.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
• SPAM attack on our support group
  • From: Dennis Simpson <dennis@bconnex.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: James_deleskie <jdeleski@Fox.nstn.ca>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Eric Wieling <eric@ccti.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Dale Drew <ddrew@mci.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Adrian Bool <aid@u-net.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Alex Przekupowski <oop@idt.net>
• RE: QoS/CoS interest (again) & Fiber Cut ....
  • From: Peter Cole <Peter.Cole@telescan.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Mike Diehn <mdiehn@mindspring.net>
• Your crystal and oscillator needs
  • From: monkey2@idt.net
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: ken emery <ken@cnet.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Tool Demos at NANOG
  • From: "Susan R. Harris" <srh@merit.edu>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Eric Wieling <eric@ccti.net>
• IDT apologizes
  • From: Len Rose <len@CORP.IDT.NET>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Alex Przekupowski <oop@idt.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• UUnet routes from hell..
  • From: Harold Willison <harold@agis.net>
• BGP?
  • From: Robert Bowman <rob@elite.exodus.net>
• 73K prefixes?
  • From: Jonathan Heiliger <loco@isi.net>
• Rash assumptions about local telco policies
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Dalvenjah FoxFire <dalvenjah@dal.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Eric Wieling <eric@ccti.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: David Schiffrin <daves@adnc.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Brett Frankenberger <brettf@netcom.com>
• Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: Keith McCallion <keith@iswest.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: John Caruso <caruso@cnet.com>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: Jonathan Heiliger <loco@isi.net>
• Re: UUnet routes from hell..
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• UUNET's Happy Router
  • From: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris@nap.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: sasaki@idc.ad.jp
• Re: BGP?
  • From: Sanjay Dani <sanjay@professionals.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: Nathan Stratton <nathan@robotics.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: prue@ISI.EDU
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• Re: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Sharif Torpis <storpis@crl.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Alex \"Mr. Worf\" Yuriev" <alex@netaxs.com>
• Re: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: Golan Ben-Oni <bnite@tremere.ios.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• Re: UUnet routes from hell..
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Dale Drew <ddrew@mci.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• multihome w/o BGP4
  • From: "Richard Welty" <welty@wednesday.inet-solutions.net>
• Re: 73K prefixes?
  • From: David Carmean <dlc@avtel.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: multihome w/o BGP4
  • From: <rhuey@compuserve.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Steve Meuse <smeuse@bbnplanet.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Matt Ranney" <mjr@ranney.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Selina F. Priestley" <selina@ans.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• Re: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: blast <blast@broder.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: blast <blast@broder.com>
• OSPF Vs EIGRP
  • From: "Patrick O'Keefe" <pokeefe@critical.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
• Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP
  • From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>
• Re: OSPF Vs EIGRP
  • From: "Shaun S. Amini" <samini@diginetusa.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
• Is 701 becoming 7007?
  • From: cameo <cameo@netsys.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Matthew V. J. Whalen" <mwhalen@uucom.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Danny McPherson <danny@genuity.net>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: David Carmean <dlc@avtel.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Denial of service attacks apparently from UUNET Netblocks
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>
• Filters
  • From: Michael Dillon <michael@priori.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Mark Milhollan <mlm@ftel.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Steve Meuse <smeuse@bbnplanet.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@att.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: jleddy@mediaone.net (John Leddy)
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: "Mike Norris" <mnorris@HEA.IE>
• Prefix filtering traditional A space (Was Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU)
  • From: Mark Milhollan <mlm@ftel.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: ken emery <ken@cnet.com>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu <cengiz@ISI.EDU>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Danny McPherson <danny@genuity.net>
• Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
  • From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@att.com>
• Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering
  • From: Anthony Pardini <tony@cmpu.net>
• (Fwd) Re: Request for your advice
  • From: narlar@agcs.com
• Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes)
  • From: "Mr. Dana Hudes" <dhudes@graphnet.com>
• Re: Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering
  • From: Josh Beck <jbeck@connectnet.com>
• Emerging Technologies
  • From: "Patrick O'Keefe" <pokeefe@critical.net>
• Re: Problems with UUnet and Sprint peering
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Emerging Technologies
  • From: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
• Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes)
  • From: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
• Draft NANOG Agenda
  • From: "Susan R. Harris" <srh@merit.edu>
• Re: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Re: 971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL
  • From: Wayne Bouchard <web@typo.org>
• 971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL
  • From: Chris Layne <nc1206@noc.netcom.net>
• Re: 971010:1000PDT: Fiber-cut in Daytona, FL
  • From: Chris Wilson <cbw@atlantic.net>
• The Cidr Report
  • From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
• RE: Mae-East Reboot?
  • From: "McElearney, Kevin" <KMcElearney@MediaOne.com>
• BGP tables
  • From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• 70,000 entries?
  • From: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
• Sample dampening entry
  • From: "Bob Collie" <bob.collie@telalink.net>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: "miguel a.l. paraz" <map@iphil.net>
• MAE-East Down better than up?
  • From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>
• Re: MAE-East Down better than up?
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: MAE-East Down better than up?
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: MAE-East Down better than up?
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
• Operational issue - mae-east
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Operational issue - mae-east
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: David Schmidt <davids@folk.ivn.net>
• Re: [NOOP] 24x7 NOC..
  • From: Todd Graham Lewis <tlewis@mindspring.net>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: mark@exodus.net (Mark Tripod)
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: "Alex \"Mr. Worf\" Yuriev" <alex@netaxs.com>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: Vlad <vlad@athens.servint.com>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: BGP tables [follow up]
  • From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>
• Looking Glass Source
  • From: Mark Tripod <mark@exodus.net>
• Have you been bought by a telco yet?
  • From: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org>
• Re: BGP tables
  • From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
• Multihoming at same NAP/IX?
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
• Re: Multihoming at same NAP/IX?
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Fall 97 NANOG update...
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• NSI Bulletin 097-007 | Network Solutions emergency telephone number
  • From: "David H. Holtzman" <dholtz@internic.net>
• Re: Have you been bought by a telco yet?
  • From: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
• Re: Have you been bought by a telco yet?
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• REMINDER NANOG MEETING
  • From: Pam Ciesla <pam@merit.edu>
• Re: Fall 97 NANOG update...
  • From: Eric Sobocinski <sobo@merit.edu>
• Re: Fall 97 NANOG update...
  • From: Marc Teichtahl <marct@campaspe.vicnet.net.au>
• NANOG MEETING - HELP
  • From: Pam Ciesla <pam@merit.edu>
• Draft Agenda, Part II: The Sequel
  • From: "Susan R. Harris" <srh@merit.edu>
• The Cidr Report
  • From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
• Getting PING bombed...
  • From: dougd@airmail.net (Doug Davis)
• CCBSs
  • From: Per Gregers Bilse <bilse@EU.net>
• Re: Getting PING bombed...
  • From: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
• Re: Getting PING bombed...
  • From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
• Re: Getting PING bombed...
  • From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
• Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience?
  • From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
• Hello
  • From: startyour@giantheap.com
• Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: postmaster@thehitman.com
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
• Speakers - 8th Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks
  • From: Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research <mctr@cs.umbc.edu>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
• Re: Getting PING bombed...
  • From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris@nap.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
• Re: Getting PING bombed...
  • From: Golan Ben-Oni <bnite@tremere.ios.com>
• Re: Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience?
  • From: rja@corp.home.net (Ran Atkinson)
• Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Paulo Maffei <paulo@br.global-one.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>
• Re: Packet over SONet/SDH (POS) experience?
  • From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: stickybit <linneweh@concentric.net>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Hagai Yardeny <hy@wbi.com>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@ollie.clive.ia.us>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Vern Paxson <vern@ee.lbl.gov>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
• CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Hagai Yardeny <hy@wbi.com>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Dennis Simpson <dennis@bconnex.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: "Richard Welty" <welty@wednesday.inet-solutions.net>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: Peter Evans <peter@gol.ad.jp>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Michael Kindig - Compute Intensive <mkindig@compute.com>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>
• Looking for "National" NAPs
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• Re: Looking for "National" NAPs
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning)
• Re: Looking for "National" NAPs
  • From: Robert Bowman <rob@elite.exodus.net>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: Leigh Porter <leigh@wisper.net>
• Re: CNN - Justice seeks $1 million a day contempt fine against Microsoft - October 20, 1997
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Web Biz Universal Remove List Update
  • From: Steve Mansfield <steve@nwnet.net>
• Does NANOG hate Microsoft?
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Syn flooding attacks
  • From: "Kenneth E. Gray" <kegray@cisco.com>
• Operational issue (Mae-west)
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Possible topic?
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Richard Irving <rirving@onecall.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Richard Irving <rirving@onecall.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Paul G. Donner" <pdonner@cisco.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Roy <garlic@garlic.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Snowdog <snowdog@charm.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Wayne Bouchard <web@typo.org>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Wayne Bouchard <web@typo.org>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Steven Schnell <schnell@gsd.sprint.com>
• Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Peter Lothberg <roll@Stupi.SE>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Vadim Antonov <avg@pluris.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Joseph Malcolm <jmalcolm@uraeus.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Joseph Kucic <jkucic@ans.net>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Steven Schnell <schnell@gsd.sprint.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking?
  • From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Steven Schnell <schnell@gsd.sprint.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Jessica Yu <jyy@ans.net>
• Sprint NAP
  • From: jvanick@megsinet.net (Jason Vanick)
• Exchange point stats info
  • From: Jeremy Porter <jerry@fc.net>
• Re: Exchange point stats info
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: Exchange point stats info
  • From: Subodh Nijsure <subodh@best.com>
• Re: Sprint NAP
  • From: Vab Goel <vgoel@sprint.net>
• Re: Exchange point stats info
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: Sprint NAP
  • From: Reid Fishler <redhead@cloudy.lightning.net>
• Real statistics (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Snowdog <snowdog@charm.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Mike Leber <mleber@he.net>
• Re: Real statistics (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Jessica Yu <jyy@ans.net>
• Re: Which pipe dream should we be smoking? (was Re: Possible topic?)
  • From: Sharif Torpis <storpis@crl.com>
• Host for NANOG 12
  • From: "William B. Norton" <wbn@merit.edu>
• NetSurvey Cable Modem Survey... Qualify for FREE Service!
  • From: NetSurvey <modem@internetmedia.com>
• NAP Architecture
  • From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Chris A. Icide" <chris@nap.net>
• something of interest to gated users
  • From: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>
• Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East
  • From: kachun@zippo.com (Kachun Lee)
• Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East
  • From: Shahin Bakhshandeh <shahin@isea.com>
• Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: Operational issue (Mae-west) or Mae-East
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Reminder for Phoenix NANOG
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>
• Business Opportunity
  • From: cvn1@massmania.com
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: David Carmean <dlc@avtel.net>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: Alex Kinch <alexk@ftech.net>
• The Cidr Report
  • From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: "Syed M. Irfan Ashraf" <irfan@cisco.com>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: David Carmean <dlc@avtel.net>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: Harold Willison <harold@agis.net>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com>
• mbone at nanog
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• Re: Business Opportunity
  • From: Bradley Reynolds <brad@b63695.student.cwru.edu>
• address blocks for nanog
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• mbone at nanog (again)
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• OK.
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: OK.
  • From: "Jay Stewart" <cosmo@olywa.net>
• Re: OK.
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: OK.
  • From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup@fibernet.net>
• Re: OK.
  • From: jamie@intuition.iagnet.net (Jamie Rishaw)
• Re: OK.
  • From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
• Re: OK.
  • From: Dale Drew <ddrew@mci.net>
• mbone and realvideo
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• Re: mbone and realvideo
  • From: Derek Andree <derek@firstcomm.com>
• Re: mbone and realvideo
  • From: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@ollie.clive.ia.us>
• nanog event
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: nanog event
  • From: andrew khoo <andrewk@aussie.net>
• Re: mbone and realvideo
  • From: Nicholas Bastin <nbastin@dns-1.wtic.net>
• Re: OK.
  • From: mark@exodus.net (Mark Tripod)
• Re: mbone and realvideo
  • From: ken emery <ken@cnet.com>
• router monitoring
  • From: brett watson <bwatson@genuity.net>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Re: Possible topic?
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Pre-NANOG tutorial on routing on the web...
  • From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
• Re: OK.
  • From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup@fibernet.net>
• Re: router monitoring
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Mbone help at NANOG 11.
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• Re: OK.
  • From: Leigh Porter <leigh@wisper.net>
• cisco rsh enable
  • From: "Steve Lalonde" <steve@enta.net>
• Agenda for Interprovider Ops BOF at NANOG 11
  • From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@Merit.Net>
• FCC proposes V-Chip for computers, from Time/Netly News
  • From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
• Operational: MAE-WEST
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• LATE NOTICE: NANOG MBONE BROADCAST SET UP AND NOW BEING BROADCAST
  • From: k claffy <kc@nlanr.net>
• Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: jvanick@megsinet.net (Jason Vanick)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Chris MacFarlane" <cjm@ican.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: David Mercer <dmercer@world.std.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Don Stacy <dstacy@visi.com>
• OFF TOPIC: where are spam control lists?
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Scott Hazen Mueller <zorch@orbit.hooked.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
• RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jordan Mendelson <jordy@wserv.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Bill Hogan <bhogan@titania.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Rwhois and SWIP
  • From: "Wilson Chu" <wilson@above.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Rik Schneider <rik@master.netasset.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Rik Schneider <rik@master.netasset.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: David Bowie <dbowie@bbnplanet.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Martin Cox <mcox@yagosys.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Rik Schneider <rik@master.netasset.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup@fibernet.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Martin Cox <mcox@yagosys.com>
• Re: Rwhois and SWIP
  • From: Joe Provo - Network Architect <jprovo@ma.ultranet.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
• IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Dalvenjah FoxFire <dalvenjah@dal.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Karl Denninger <karl@Mcs.Net>
• No Subject
  • From: rlevally@cias.net
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Kent W. England" <kwe@geo.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Stephen Dolloff <vardalak@mc.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Dale Drew <ddrew@mci.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Steve Mansfield <steve@nwnet.net>
• RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Richard Welty" <welty@wednesday.inet-solutions.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: the Riz <riz@beast.boogers.sf.ca.us>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp@hilander.com>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Richard Mataka <mataka@telehouse.com>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Jeremy Porter <jerry@fc.net>
• Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
  • From: Mark Milhollan <mlm@ftel.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Leigh Porter <leigh@wisper.net>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago <cthixton@thoughtport.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: IP spoofing and spamming
  • From: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
• RE: NAP Architecture
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Matt Ryan <matt@planet.net.uk>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Scott Hazen Mueller <zorch@orbit.hooked.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: "Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI" <blkirk@float.eli.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Dannyman <djhoward@uiuc.edu>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
• Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Dalvenjah FoxFire <dalvenjah@dal.net>
• Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
  • From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Derek Andree <derek@firstcomm.com>
• SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@devel.nacs.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Mike Leber <mleber@he.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Operational: MAE-WEST
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago <cthixton@thoughtport.net>
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Brian Moore <bem@cmc.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Phil Lawlor <phil@agis.net>
• Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Brian Moore <bem@cmc.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Dannyman <djhoward@uiuc.edu>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Dannyman <djhoward@uiuc.edu>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Dorn Hetzel <dorn@atl.eni.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Dannyman <djhoward@uiuc.edu>
• Re: Tracking SPAM (Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful)
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: Brian Moore <bem@cmc.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: dlr@bungi.com (Dave Rand)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: SPAM, IEMMC, and Caller ID
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• RE: NAP Architecture
  • From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@genuity.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
• RE: NAP Architecture
  • From: Chad Skidmore <cskidmor@nwnexus.com>
• RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Paul Peterson <paulp@winterlan.com>
• RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Paul Peterson <paulp@winterlan.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Matt Ryan <matt@planet.net.uk>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Peter Galbavy <peter@wonderland.org>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Peter Galbavy <peter@wonderland.org>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Matt Ryan <matt@planet.net.uk>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Paul Flores <pflores@wcg.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Joe Provo - Network Architect <jprovo@ma.ultranet.com>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
• Re: NAP Architecture
  • From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
• Enforcable AUPs
  • From: David Hares - AutoNet <dhares@autonet.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Brian W. Pendleton" <brian@cais.net>
• Link to Scams: On the Net
  • From: Onthenet@advocacy-net.com
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago <cthixton@thoughtport.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Turnando Fuad <fuad@ns.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Cal Thixton - President - ThoughtPort Authority of Chicago <cthixton@thoughtport.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@devel.nacs.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@priori.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: Jon Stevens <jon@clearink.com>
• Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: mark@exodus.net (Mark Tripod)
• Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: Jon Stevens <jon@clearink.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Alan Hannan <hannan@bythetrees.com>
• Re: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: Deepak Jain <deepak@jain.com>
• RE: Operational: MAE-WEST
  • From: Chris Fairbanks <chrisf@winterlan.com>
• RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@Merit.Net>
• RE: Spammer web harvesting tool countermeasures
  • From: Jamie Scheinblum <jamie@fast.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Final Program - 8 Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks
  • From: Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research <mctr@cs.umbc.edu>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Final Program - 8 Maryland Workshop on High Speed Networks
  • From: Account of Maryland Center for Telecommunications Research <mctr@cs.umbc.edu>
• RE: Operational: MAE-WEST
  • From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup@fibernet.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• potentially profitable spam countermeasures
  • From: "Erik E. Fair" (Timekeeper) <fair@clock.org>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Peter Galbavy <peter@wonderland.org>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Art Houle <houle@zeppo.acns.fsu.edu>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Phil Howard <phil@charon.milepost.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: johnl@iecc.com (John R. Levine)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
• Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures
  • From: "Peter E. Giza" <giza@adsmart.net>
• Kashpureff in custody.
  • From: Marc Hurst <mhurst@fastlane.ca>
• (forw) Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Patrick Lynch <plynch@ind.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Bill Unsworth <bill@u-net.net>
• Boy are we off-topic...was Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: "Mike Norris" <mnorris@hea.ie>
• to control spam let's break the net?
  • From: Robert Laughlin <robert@portal.dx.net>
• Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures
  • From: Eric Germann <ekgermann@cctec.com>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Robert Bowman <rob@elite.exodus.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu <cengiz@ISI.EDU>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu <cengiz@ISI.EDU>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Danny McPherson <danny@genuity.net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Abha Ahuja <ahuja@merit.edu>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@Merit.Net>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: potentially profitable spam countermeasures
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Thoughts on spam control
  • From: Patrick Lynch <plynch@ind.net>
• The Cidr Report
  • From: Tony Bates <tbates@cisco.com>
• Re: to control spam let's break the net?
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@Merit.Net>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Abha Ahuja <ahuja@merit.edu>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Abha Ahuja <ahuja@merit.edu>
• Re: Problems with specific routing policies for each exchange point
  • From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
  • From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>