Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful

• To: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net>
• Subject: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
• From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@priori.net>
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:15:24 -0800
• Cc: nanog@merit.edu
• In-Reply-To: <9710281114.AA16931@ncc.ripe.net> [9710.28]
• References: <9710281114.AA16931@ncc.ripe.net>
• Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu

On Oct 28, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote: 

> Some of them are esentially centralsied methods of controlling Internet
> content.  Paul's anti-spam feed for instance prevents users of some
> providers from seeing spam.  The user has no choice; they cannot opt to
> receive spam other than by switching to another provider.  Even worse:
> they may not even be aware that they are "missing" some content. 

	Users should be aware if their ISP is blocking something,
	no matter what it is.  However, that's not a technical or
	operational issue...I'm not sure what category it is.

*********************************************************
J.D. Falk                         voice: +1-650-482-2840 	
Supervisor, Network Operations      fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC.              http://www.priori.net

"The People You Know.  The People You Trust."
*********************************************************

• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
• From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
• Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
• From: Rik Schneider <rik@master.netasset.com>

• Spam Control Considered Harmful
• From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net>

• Prev: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
• Next: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread